Non-human living sculptures by Hans Haacke and Pierre Huyghe
11/22/2024
8 min reading time
In his early work, Hans Haacke already integrated animals and plants as co-actors into his art. In that way he not only laid the foundations for a redefinition of sculpture as a real-time system, but also paved the way for a contemporary artistic practice such as is championed by Pierre Huyghe.
Lorem Ipsum
Together with the ZERO group founders Heinz Mack, Otto Piene, and GĂŒnther Uecker, in 1965 Hans Haacke designed an outdoor sculpÂtural ensemble for the pier in Scheveningen, NetherÂlands. It consisted of barrels of fire mounted on rafts, buoys as mobile sculpÂtures, bottles with ZERO messages in them, silver foil on the water, and objects made of smoke. Haacke planned to gather seagÂulls by using a mobile feeding point, and he construed their flight inforÂmaÂtion and âmassâ as a âseagull sculpÂtureâ. In particÂular in his early oeuvre (approx. 1965â72), he increasÂingly used animals and plants as co-actors in his sculpÂtural concepts and humorÂously described them as his âFranÂciscan worksâ, alluding to St. Francis of Assisi who was, after all, considÂered a friend of all animals and an ecolÂoÂgist. In this way, the âflying sculpÂtureâ was one of the early works that used âlivingâ mateÂrial to estabÂlish a living sculpÂtural aesthetic, i.e., so-called ânon-human living sculpÂturesâ.
By turning his back on a classic object-based aesthetics, with these non-human living sculpÂtures he called for a redeÂfÂiÂnÂiÂtion of the medium of sculpÂture in favor of âsculpÂture as a real-time systemâ. In other words, the sculpÂture first evolves before the eyes of the audiÂence, is no longer static, and instead responds through its process to its surroundÂings. A prime example of his approach is âGoat Feeding in Woodsâ: For this piece realÂized at FondaÂtion Maeght in the south of France in 1970, Haacke confronted a goat with a new habitat and new food. This real-time and âbiologÂical systemâ included choosing the section of the woods, the temperÂaÂture, the weather, the animalâs biodiÂverÂsity and nutriÂtional prefÂerÂences, such that the goatâs organism and metabÂoÂlism, which form a unique complex system, became the theme of the piece. The action was also a nod to instiÂtuÂtion critique: The young Haacke had this âliving sculpÂtureâ eat and model at will in the immeÂdiate vicinity of the grand museum park in which stood sculpÂtures by renowned artists such as Joan MirĂł and Alberto Giacometti.
The lines dividing nature and culture
In the form of the domesÂtiÂcated and isolated goat, Haacke defended artâs freedom against a founÂdaÂtion that was only charÂiÂtable at first sight and had been set up by gallery owner AimĂ© Maeght. And Haacke went even further, as he critÂiÂcized the role of artists as âworking animalsâ within art instiÂtuÂtions and the powerful art market system. On that same occaÂsion, during the exhiÂbiÂtion opening he let ten tortoises he had bought in a pet shop free. During this period in his oeuvre, he also proceeded to create several artiÂfiÂcial microÂcliÂmates with water, rain, snow, ice and water vapor â a âdemonÂstraÂtionâ of instiÂtuÂtion critique by showing how art can generate its own, indeÂpenÂdent climate. His âFranÂciscan seriesâ thus quesÂtions not only the limits of a work of art in relaÂtion to its surroundÂings, the pieces in quesÂtion also explore the lines dividing culture and nature, which is why the series has such a bearing on contemÂpoÂrary artistic pracÂtice.
Planned down to the smallest details â and yet hard to control
He strucÂtured the hilly area by heaping up piles of sand as well as humus, fragÂments of asphalt, cube-shaped cobble stones, and ground slabs he layered in stacks. MoreÂover, he then planted psychotropic and aphroÂdisiÂacal species by way of new vegeÂtaÂtion. In a concrete pond filled with water, tadpoles thrived and grew into frogs. âMarkers of history, and markers that I am marked, affected and influÂenced byâ, as Huyghe himself said, were distribÂuted throughout: There was a dead tree in remiÂnisÂcence of Robert Smithsonâs âDead Treeâ (1969), a concrete bench with a pink seat tipped on its side and bringing to mind Dominique Gonzalez-FoerÂsterâs âA Plan for Escapeâ from docuÂmenta 11 (2002), an uprooted oak with a piece of basalt recalling Joseph Beuysâ â7,000 oaks â urban forestry not urban planÂningâ at DocuÂmenta 7 (1982), not to mention a replica in concrete of a 1930s female nude by Max Weber, whose head shrouded in a beehive. Then there was âHumanâ, a white female greyÂhound with a pink leg, and a brown-and-white whelp with a simiÂlarly colored paw, who both roamed the grounds accomÂpaÂnied by a dog-keeper.
What Huyghe showed viewers eagerly wandering about trying to find the artwork was in fact nature in various stages of emerÂgence and decay so that one was inclined to ask what had been there before or rather where exactly Huyghe had interÂvened? Some of what was happening would have occurred in a similar way without the artist. Ants distribÂuted seeds, put the remains of plants and dead creaÂtures to their own uses; compost waste rotted to form humus, decomÂposed by beetles and worms; bees polliÂnated blosÂsoms. The vegeÂtaÂtion changed over the 100 days during which the show ran; animal protagÂoÂnists entered the zone while others left the area, which was not enclosed by a fence. âUntilledâ thus repreÂsented a âsculpÂtural situÂaÂtionâ in which the artist created the preconÂdiÂtions for the overall setting but largely left these actors to their own devices in their particÂular spaces. As had been the case in Haackeâs work, here sculpÂture evolves into a situÂaÂtion in which it arises through interÂacÂtion with heteroÂgeÂneous objects and actors.
Lorem Ipsum
The juxtaÂpoÂsiÂtion of the work of Hans Haacke to that of Pierre Huyghe creates new perspecÂtives on sculpÂture as a medium: The two artists quesÂtion the long-standing tradiÂtion of an object-based aesthetics and by creating matrices of relaÂtionÂships using all manner of different actors favor instead one founded on openÂness, process, and relaÂtionÂality. While Haackeâs systems are meant to be revealed such that we can visuÂally compreÂhend them, in the case of Huyghe the interÂlinkÂages remain largely hidden from sight. For all the dynamism, both protagÂoÂnists conceive an âimageâ in their minds beforeÂhand that in the course of the exhiÂbiÂtion for all its suggested openÂness (in the case of Huyghe) was subject to modiÂfiÂcaÂtion and constant nurture. Both artists simuÂlate and domesÂtiÂcate nature; with their ânon-human living sculpÂturesâ they present nature as created by humankind, i.e., a âthird natureâ, and thus make a substanÂtive contriÂbuÂtion to expanding our notion of sculpÂture.
You may also like
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
- Context
Hans Haacke in New York
- Interview
About Time. With Marie-Theres Deutsch
- Context
These boots are made for walking
- Context
Seeing nature anew â through a cube
- What’s cooking?
From studio to dining table: What a festive spread!
- Video Art
Lifting the veil
- Context
A new look at the artist â âLâaltra metĂ dellâavanguardia 1910â1940â
- Context
The film to the exhibition: Hans Haacke. Retrospective